Democracy and Political Legitimacy: Is Democracy a Necessary Condition for Political Legitimacy?

(This article was originally published in Journal of Science, Humanities and Arts, Vol. 3(1), on 10th February 2016) ----- The problem I intend to solve in this paper is this: is democracy, defined below, a necessary condition for the legitimacy of a political entity. In my view, the claim that democracy constitutes a necessary condition for political legitimacy is a false statement. At most, democracy is one of the many political instruments that brings out one of the main political ideals, namely, the ideal of equality, in the political domain. (...)

Wittgenstein or Frankenstein: The Concept of Rule Following in Legal Indeterminacy

(This article was originally published in International Journal of Multidisciplinary Academic Research, Vol. 3 (3) 2015, in September 2015) ----- In recent years, legal scholars have tried to explore the possibility of borrowing ideas from various disciplines in order to provide new solution to existing legal problems. When a complex idea is being borrowed, such as Ludwig Wittgenstein’s concept of rule following, the original work must not be distorted or misinterpreted. This paper argues that such misfortune has happened within legal scholarship. This mishandling has inflated volumes of unnecessary literature. Hence, it is time to admit that the existing applications of the concept of rule following are neither helpful nor useful for the understanding of law. (...)

教授,天才和上帝

剛剛看完 'The Man Who Knew Infinity' (2015) ,講述數學天才 Srinivasa Ramanujan 和劍橋數學家 G.H. Hardy 的奇緣。看這部電影前,我對Ramanujan的人生或對他的數學理論也是一無所知,看完後仍只是略有所知,對電影沒有對這方面深入探討有一點兒遺憾,但對宗教信仰和知識的探討我是彼喜歡的。(...)

我: 在這世界找自己的一’點’

兒時的我,是一舊雲。浪費了很多光陰,日日玩電腦遊戲,荒廢學業。中二時,到了澳洲寄宿學校讀書,仍然是一舊雲,豈不料十年級時因對老師不禮,差點兒被趕出校,但世界就是有這一條道理:在最差勁的時候,差得最壞的狀況,命運會反彈。當時,校長召見了我去了解事情。校長是一位非常講道理的人,跟我説「男孩子做錯事,不算什麼大件事,只需認錯就可。但要記住,當你離開這校園的閘門後,社會會否給你第二次機會去改善?現在的你,仍年輕,請盡快改變自己!」(...)